Writing a download server. Part III: headers: Content-length and Range
Content-length
and Range
. The former signals how big the download is, the latter allows downloading files partially or continue after failure from where we started.Content-length
response header
Content-length
response header is tremendously helpful for clients that track download progress. If you send expected resource size in advance before even starting to stream bytes, client like web browser can show very accurate progress bar and even estimate total download time by measuring average download speed. Without Content-length
client will just keep downloading as long as possible, hoping the stream will end one day. There are however some circumstances when obtaining precise content length is hard. For example maybe you stream resources from some other download server or your resource is compressed on the fly and sent directly to servlet response. In both of these cases the best you can do is actually caching the data locally on disk, figuring out what the size is and start streaming when data is available. This is not a contradiction to an advice to always stream, never keep fully in memory. In this case we store temporary file on disk, but still stream it once fully ready and its size is known.From Java perspective providing content length is darn simple:
private ResponseEntity<Resource> response(FilePointer filePointer, HttpStatus status, Resource body) {Notice that a method
return ResponseEntity
.status(status)
.eTag(filePointer.getEtag())
.contentLength(filePointer.getSize())
.lastModified(filePointer.getLastModified().toEpochMilli())
.body(body);
}
Resource.contentLength()
also exists, but different types of resource compute it differently, sometimes eagerly reading the whole resource. I have my own FilePointer
abstraction that knows the size of file we want to download.Range
request header
Range
header is a "new" feature of HTTP/1.1 described nicely in RFC 7233. The idea is that client can request just part of the resource (in terms of byte range) mainly for two reasons:- Previous download was interrupted and we don't want to repeat the same work. In this case client knows how many bytes it received and asks for the remaining part
- We are streaming data (e.g. video) and we want to skip certain part. Think about online player like Youtube and clicking in the middle of progress bar. Client can simply estimate which part of the file it needs now, proportionally to movie duration.
Range
requests so there is a bit of negotiation happening. First client sends a request asking for just part of the file, first 100 bytes in this example:> GET /big_buck_bunny_1080p_surround.avi HTTP/1.1If the target server supports range request, it responds with
> Range: bytes=0-99
...
206 Partial Content
:< HTTP/1.1 206 Partial ContentThere are many interesting headers here. First of all it's 206, not 200 OK as usual. If it was 200 OK, client must assume that server doesn't support range requests. The sample server is very well behaving, it also sends us
< Last-Modified: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:21:35 GMT
< ETag: "8000089-375a6422-44c8e0d0f0dc0"
< Accept-Ranges: bytes
< Content-Length: 100
< Content-Range: bytes 0-99/928670754
Last-Modified
and ETag
headers to improve caching. Additionally the server confirms it's capable of handling Range
requests by sending Accept-Ranges
header. Currently only bytes
is widely used, but RFC permits other range units in the future (seconds? frames?) Last two headers are the most interesting. Content-Length
no longer declares the total resource size - it's the size of range(s) we requested, 100 bytes in this case. The size of full resource is encoded in Content-Range
: bytes 0-99/928670754
. The server is very precise in terms of what we received: first 100 bytes (0-99
) while the total resource size is 928670754
. Knowing the total size client can basically request parts of the file in multiple chunks.The specification of
Range
requests allows a lot of flexibility, for example we can ask for multiple ranges in one request, e.g.: > GET /big_buck_bunny_1080p_surround.avi HTTP/1.1However the server is free to optimize multiple range requests, like rearranging them, merging, etc. Implementing partial requests from scratch is way beyond the scope of this article and I hope you don't have to do it yourself. For example Spring starting from 4.2.x has comprehensive, built-in support for partial requests of static resources, see:
> Range: bytes=0-9,1000-1009
...
< HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content
< Accept-Ranges: bytes
< Content-Type: multipart/byteranges; boundary=5187ab27335732
<
--5187ab27335732
Content-type: video/x-msvideo
Content-range: bytes 0-9/928670754
[data]
--5187ab27335732
Content-type: video/x-msvideo
Content-range: bytes 1000-1009/928670754
[data]
--5187ab27335732--
ResourceHttpRequestHandler
line 463.Writing a download server
- Part I: Always stream, never keep fully in memory
- Part II: headers: Last-Modified, ETag and If-None-Match
- Part III: headers: Content-length and Range
- Part IV: Implement
HEAD
operation (efficiently) - Part V: Throttle download speed
- Part VI: Describe what you send (Content-type, et.al.)
Tags: HTTP, spring, spring mvc